To Deutsche Post AG, Bonn/Germany
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Deutsche Post AG, Bonn/Germany, and its subsidiaries (the Group) which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at 31 December 2023, the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023, and the notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In addition, we have audited the combined management report for the Parent and the group of Deutsche Post AG, Bonn/Germany, for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023. In accordance with the German legal requirements, we have not audited the content of the combined non-financial statement pursuant to Sections 289b and 315b German Commercial Code (HGB), which is included in the section “Non-financial statement” of the combined management report, nor the combined corporate governance statement pursuant to Sections 289f and 315d HGB, which is included in the section “Governance” of the combined management report. Moreover, we have not audited the content of those paragraphs and disclosures extraneous to the combined management report that are marked as unaudited in the combined management report.
In our opinion, on the basis of the knowledge obtained in the audit,
We conducted our audit of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report in accordance with Section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation (No. 537/2014; referred to subsequently as “EU Audit Regulation”) and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW). We performed the audit of the consolidated financial statements in supplementary compliance with the International Standards on Auditing (ISA). Our responsibilities under those requirements, principles and standards are further described in the “Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report” section of our auditor’s report. We are independent of the group entities in accordance with the requirements of European law and German commercial and professional law, and we have fulfilled our other German professional responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. In addition, in accordance with Article 10 (2) point (f) of the EU Audit Regulation, we declare that we have not provided non-audit services prohibited under Article 5 (1) of the EU Audit Regulation. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole and in forming our audit opinion thereon; we do not provide a separate audit opinion on these matters.
In the following we present the key audit matters we have determined in the course of our audit:
1. Recoverability of goodwill
2. Measurement of pension obligations and plan assets
Our presentation of these key audit matters has been structured as follows:
a) description (including reference to corresponding information in the consolidated financial statements)
b) auditor’s response
1. Recoverability of goodwill
a) In the consolidated financial statements as at 31 December 2023 of Deutsche Post AG, goodwill amounting to EUR 13.1 billion is reported under the balance sheet item “Intangible assets”, representing about 20% of total assets and 57% of the Group’s reported equity. Goodwill is tested for impairment by the Company at least once a year for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements regardless of whether there are external or internal indications that the assets may be impaired. The impairment test is based on a calculation model in which the planned future cash flows are discounted at the weighted average cost of capital using a discounted cash flow method. The planned future cash flows are derived from the executive directors’ adopted middle-term planning and the supervisory board’s approved budget planning.
The result of this measurement depends to a large extent on the assumptions made by the executive directors for the determination of future cash flows and the determination of the parameters for the discount rates used and is therefore subject to considerable uncertainty. Against this background and given the complexity of the underlying measurement models as well as the material importance of goodwill, this matter was of particular significance within the framework of our audit.
The executive directors’ disclosures on goodwill are contained in note 22 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
b) In our audit, we dealt with the process for performing goodwill impairment tests and obtained, among others, an understanding of the accounting controls that are included in the process and retraced the method applied to carry out the impairment tests. Where identified controls were relevant to our audit, we had their design and implementation tested. In the case of estimates made by the executive directors, we evaluated the reasonableness of the methods applied, assumptions made and data used. Specifically, we satisfied ourselves as to the appropriateness of the future cash flows used in the measurement, by, among others, comparing these values with the middle-term planning adopted by the executive directors and the budget planning approved by the supervisory board as well as with general and industry-specific market expectations. As even relatively small changes in the discount rate used can have a material impact on the measurement results, we had the discount rates tested by verifying the parameters used through public data bases and own calculations of the discount rates, compared them with the discount rates used and evaluated any deviations. In addition, we retraced the calculation model and examined whether it considered all value-determining parameters and whether all mathematical connections were correct.
Due to the fact that the measurement also depends on economic conditions beyond the Company’s sphere of influence, we additionally evaluated the sensitivity analysis prepared by the Company.
Our audit procedures were supported by our internal valuation experts.
2. Measurement of pension obligations and plan assets
a) In the consolidated financial statements as at 31 December 2023 of Deutsche Post AG, a total of EUR 2.5 billion is reported under the balance sheet item “Provisions for pensions and similar obligations”. Moreover, as a result of pension scheme surpluses in some defined benefit plans, pension assets of EUR 0.2 billion are reported under the balance sheet item “Other non-current assets” as at 31 December 2023. The net pension provisions of EUR 2.3 billion were calculated on the basis of the present value of the obligation of EUR 14.2 billion, less the plan assets of EUR 12.0 billion measured at fair value and an asset ceiling effect of EUR 0.1 billion. In measuring pension provisions, the executive directors in particular made assumptions about the discount rate and long-term salary and pension trends as well as average life expectancy with the help of an external actuary. Changes in the measurement parameters and experience adjustments resulted in actuarial losses of EUR 0.7 billion as at 31 December 2023. In addition, measuring plan assets at fair value is subject to estimation uncertainties. Deviations from the planned development of the fair value of the plan assets resulted in losses of EUR 0.1 billion that are recognised directly in equity. In our view, these matters were of particular significance in our audit as the measurement of these high-value items is to a large extent based on estimates and discretionary assumptions made by the executive directors.
The Company’s disclosures on pension provisions and similar obligations and on plan assets are contained in note 37 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
b) We dealt with the process for measurement of pension provisions and plan assets, obtaining an understanding of the accounting controls included in the process. Where identified controls were relevant to our audit, we had their design and implementation tested. In the case of estimates made by the executive directors, we evaluated the reasonableness of the methods applied, assumptions made and data used. We had the appropriateness of the measurement parameters for pension provisions, including the related assumptions made, evaluated by means of expert opinions provided to us and a comparison with market-related data. This audit procedure was carried out involving internal experts for pension valuations. Moreover, we satisfied ourselves as to the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the actuary engaged by the executive directors. Our examination of the fair values of plan assets was in particular based on bank confirmations and other asset statements and real estate appraisals. Our audit of the plan assets was supported by our internal valuation experts.
The executive directors and/or the supervisory board are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
The supervisory board is responsible for the report of the supervisory board. The executive directors and the supervisory board are responsible for the declaration related to the German Corporate Governance Code pursuant to Section 161 German Stock Corporation Act (AktG), which is part of the combined corporate governance statement included in the combined management report. Otherwise, the executive directors are responsible for the other information.
Our audit opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report do not cover the other information, and consequently we do not express an audit opinion or any other form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, to consider whether the other information
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
The executive directors are responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that comply, in all material respects, with IFRS as adopted by the EU and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to Section 315e (1) HGB, and that the consolidated financial statements, in compliance with these requirements, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and financial performance of the Group. In addition, the executive directors are responsible for such internal control as they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud (i.e. fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets) or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the executive directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. They also have the responsibility for disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern. In addition, they are responsible for financial reporting based on the going concern basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or there is no realistic alternative but to do so.
Furthermore, the executive directors are responsible for the preparation of the combined management report that as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position and is, in all material respects, consistent with the consolidated financial statements, complies with German legal requirements, and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development. In addition, the executive directors are responsible for such arrangements and measures (systems) as they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of a combined management report that is in accordance with the applicable German legal requirements, and to be able to provide sufficient appropriate evidence for the assertions in the combined management report.
The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and whether the combined management report as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position and, in all material respects, is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and the knowledge obtained in the audit, complies with the German legal requirements and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development, as well as to issue an auditor’s report that includes our audit opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW) and in supplementary compliance with the ISA will always detect a material misstatement. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements and this combined management report.
We exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with the relevant independence requirements, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, the actions taken or safeguards applied to eliminate independence threats.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements for the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in the auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter.
Report on the Audit of the Electronic Reproductions of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report Prepared for Publication Pursuant to Section 317 (3a) HGB
We have performed an audit in accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB to obtain reasonable assurance whether the electronic reproductions of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report (hereinafter referred to as “ESEF documents”) prepared for publication, contained in the file, which has the SHA–256 value 760A6C398340D2A376085885D4B91F122FC9A02893BF1AEAC7853E0D8D8FD31C, meet, in all material respects, the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to Section 328 (1) HGB (“ESEF format”). In accordance with the German legal requirements, this audit only covers the conversion of the information contained in the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report into the ESEF format, and therefore covers neither the information contained in these electronic reproductions nor any other information contained in the file identified above.
In our opinion, the electronic reproductions of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report prepared for publication contained in the file identified above meet, in all material respects, the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to Section 328 (1) HGB. Beyond this audit opinion and our audit opinions on the accompanying consolidated financial statements and on the accompanying combined management report for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023 contained in the “Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report” above, we do not express any assurance opinion on the information contained within these electronic reproductions or on any other information contained in the file identified above.
We conducted our audit of the electronic reproductions of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report contained in the file identified above in accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB and on the basis of the IDW Auditing Standard: Audit of the Electronic Reproductions of Financial Statements and Management Reports Prepared for Publication Purposes Pursuant to Section 317 (3a) HGB (IDW AuS 410 (06.2022)). Our responsibilities in this context are further described in the “Group Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the ESEF Documents” section. Our audit firm has applied the requirements of the IDW Quality Management Standards.
The executive directors of the Parent are responsible for the preparation of the ESEF documents based on the electronic files of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report according to Section 328 (1) sentence 4 no. 1 HGB and for the tagging of the consolidated financial statements according to Section 328 (1) sentence 4 no. 2 HGB.
In addition, the executive directors of the Parent are responsible for such internal controls that they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of ESEF documents that are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to Section 328 (1) HGB.
The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the process for preparing the ESEF documents as part of the financial reporting process.
Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ESEF documents are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB. We exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
We were elected as Group auditor by the annual general meeting on 6 May 2022. We were engaged by the supervisory board on 28 April / 4 May 2023. We have been the Group auditor of Deutsche Post AG, Bonn/Germany, since the financial year 2023.
We declare that the audit opinions expressed in this auditor’s report are consistent with the additional report to the audit committee pursuant to Article 11 of the EU Audit Regulation (long-form audit report).
Our auditor’s report must always be read together with the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report as well as with the audited ESEF documents. The consolidated financial statements and the combined management report converted into the ESEF format – including the versions to be submitted for inclusion in the Company Register – are merely electronic reproductions of the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report and do not take their place. In particular, the ESEF report and our audit opinion contained therein are to be used solely together with the audited ESEF documents made available in electronic form.
The German Public Auditor responsible for the engagement is Prof. Dr Frank Beine.
Munich/Germany, 16 February 2024
Deloitte GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Prof. Dr. Frank Beine Dr. Hendrik Nardmann
Wirtschaftsprüfer Wirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor) (German Public Auditor)